Tom Keymer
Impact in
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Narrative Theory and Analysis
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism
- History top 2%
- Scottish History and National Identity
Papers in
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 2
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 2
- Themes in Literature Analysis 2
- Early Modern Spanish Literature 1
- Finance 2
- Financial Crisis of the 21st Century 2
- Co-authors
- John Mullan (1 shared paper)Peter Sabor (1 shared paper)Howard D. Weinbrot (1 shared paper)Jocelyn Harris (1 shared paper)Samuel Richardson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Review of English Studies (2 papers)Notes and Queries (2 papers)The Modern Language Review (2 papers)History Workshop Journal (1 paper)Eighteenth-Century Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Tom Keymer
8 papers receiving 47 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Literature and Literary Theory 144
- History 87
- Classics 18
- Museology 14
- Anthropology 27
Countries citing papers authored by Tom Keymer
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Keymer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Keymer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Keymer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Keymer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Keymer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Keymer. The network helps show where Tom Keymer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Tom Keymer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Pamela Controversy: Criticisms and Adaptations of Samuel Richardson's Pamela, 1740-1750 | 2000 | 73 |
| 2 | 1992 | 70 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 7 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 3 | |
| 7 | Laurence Sterne's Tristram Shandy : a casebook | 2006 | 3 |
| 8 | 1993 | 2 | |
| 9 | Prefaces, postscripts and related writings | 1998 | 1 |
| 10 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 14 | Prose fiction in English from the origins of print to 1750 | 2017 | 1 |
| 15 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 0 | |
| 17 | 1993 | 0 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 0 |
About Tom Keymer
Tom Keymer is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Finance, Museology, Religious studies and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 19 papers that have together received 187 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Crisis of the 21st Century (2 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (2 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (2 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (1 paper), Historical Geography and Cartography (1 paper), Early Modern Spanish Literature (1 paper) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (144 citations), History (87 citations), Classics (18 citations), Museology (14 citations) and Anthropology (27 citations). Tom Keymer has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John Mullan, Peter Sabor, Howard D. Weinbrot, Jocelyn Harris and Samuel Richardson. Their work appears in journals such as The Review of English Studies, Notes and Queries, The Modern Language Review, History Workshop Journal and Eighteenth-Century Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.