John Mullan

913 citations
24 papers · 467 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

John Mullan

16 papers receiving 207 citations

Peers

John Mullan
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Literature and Literary Theory 207
  • Virology 76
  • History 147
  • Museology 36
  • Anthropology 52
Replace William J. Kerrigan with:
William J. Kerrigan United States
David Marshall United Kingdom
George Gordon Byron
Edna Longley United Kingdom
Paul A. Magnuson Estonia
Barbara Körte Germany
Murray Krieger United States
Steven Mullaney India
Thomas G McFarland United States
Nicholas Hudson Canada
John Mullan relative to William J. Kerrigan United States William J. Kerrigan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.2×
William J. Kerrigan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Mullan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Mullan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Mullan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Mullan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Mullan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Mullan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Mullan. The network helps show where John Mullan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside John Mullan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Mullan Line = papers co-authored together John Mullan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990176
2 202282
3
The Pamela Controversy: Criticisms and Adaptations of Samuel Richardson's Pamela, 1740-1750
200073
4 199630
5
Eighteenth-Century Popular Culture: A Selection
200024
6 199018
7 199013
8
How Novels Work
200613
9 200610
10 19975
11 20084
12
What Matters in Jane Austen?: Twenty Crucial Puzzles Solved
20124
13 19944
14
The Lives of the Poets: A Selection
20093
15 20022
16
Scenes from a deranged marriage
19981
17
Virtue's humours
19971
18 20041
19 19981
20 20011

About John Mullan

John Mullan is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Museology and Virology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 467 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literature: history, themes, analysis (2 papers), Literature Analysis and Criticism (2 papers), Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research (1 paper), French Literature and Criticism (1 paper), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper), Financial Crisis of the 21st Century (1 paper), Visual Culture and Art Theory (1 paper) and Historical Art and Culture Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (207 citations), Virology (76 citations), History (147 citations), Museology (36 citations) and Anthropology (52 citations). John Mullan has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Patricia Meyer Spacks, Tom Keymer, Peter Sabor, Roger Lonsdale, Samuel Johnson, P. N. Furbank and W. R. Owens. Their work appears in journals such as Essays in Criticism, The Lancet Infectious Diseases, Midland History, The Modern Language Review and South Central Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact