Tom Hindmarsh Sten
Impact in
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Neuroscience and Music Perception
Papers in
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 4
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 1
-
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction 3
- Co-authors
- Kishore V. Kuchibhotla (2 shared papers)Eleni S. Papadoyannis (2 shared papers)Robert C. Froemke (2 shared papers)Jonathan V. Gill (1 shared paper)Rachel E. Field (1 shared paper)Kenneth D. Miller (1 shared paper)Grace W. Lindsay (1 shared paper)Vanessa Ruta (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Nature (2 papers)Cell (1 paper)Nature Communications (1 paper)Nature Neuroscience (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Tom Hindmarsh Sten
5 papers receiving 313 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 198
- Cognitive Neuroscience 197
- Computational Mathematics 4
- Sensory Systems 29
- Developmental Biology 12
Countries citing papers authored by Tom Hindmarsh Sten
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Hindmarsh Sten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Hindmarsh Sten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Hindmarsh Sten more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Hindmarsh Sten
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Hindmarsh Sten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Hindmarsh Sten. The network helps show where Tom Hindmarsh Sten may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Tom Hindmarsh Sten, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 214 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 63 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 24 | |
| 4 | 2025 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 6 |
About Tom Hindmarsh Sten
Tom Hindmarsh Sten is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Cognitive Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (3 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1 paper), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (1 paper) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (198 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (197 citations), Computational Mathematics (4 citations), Sensory Systems (29 citations) and Developmental Biology (12 citations). Tom Hindmarsh Sten has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Kishore V. Kuchibhotla, Eleni S. Papadoyannis, Robert C. Froemke, Jonathan V. Gill, Rachel E. Field, Kenneth D. Miller, Grace W. Lindsay, Vanessa Ruta, Rufei Li and Adriane G. Otopalik. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Cell, Nature Communications and Nature Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.