Tom Halverson

955 citations
37 papers · 541 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Tom Halverson

34 papers receiving 496 citations

Peers

Tom Halverson
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 221
  • Geometry and Topology 292
  • Algebra and Number Theory 118
  • Mathematical Physics 184
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 181
Replace Gérard Duchamp with:
Gérard Duchamp France
Misha Gromov France
Masahico Saito United States
Richard Ehrenborg United States
Bodo Pareigis Germany
Mark Dukes Iceland
Viktor Schroeder Switzerland
Józef H. Przytycki United States
Chris J. Smyth United Kingdom
Mateusz Michałek Germany
Tom Halverson relative to Gérard Duchamp France Gérard Duchamp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Gérard Duchamp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Halverson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Halverson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Halverson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Halverson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Halverson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Halverson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Halverson. The network helps show where Tom Halverson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Tom Halverson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Halverson Line = papers co-authored together Tom Halverson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004127
2 2015116
3 201327
4 200325
5 200123
6 200521
7 201320
8 201820
9 199818
10 199414
11 200912
12 200912
13 199611
14 201910
15
19978
16 20028
17 20198
18 19957
19 19957
20 20037

About Tom Halverson

Tom Halverson is a scholar working on Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Algebra and Number Theory and Theoretical Computer Science, having authored 37 papers that have together received 541 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (23 papers), Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (21 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (12 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (8 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (3 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (2 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (2 papers) and semigroups and automata theory (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (221 citations), Geometry and Topology (292 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (118 citations), Mathematical Physics (184 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (181 citations). Tom Halverson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Arun Ram, Chad M. Topaz, Lori Ziegelmeier, Georgia M. Benkart, Pierre–Nicholas Roy, Eric Van Wyk, Manuela Mazzocco, Nathaniel Thiem, Robert J. Le Roy and Vahe Poladian. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics, Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A, Journal of Algebra, European Journal of Combinatorics and The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact