Tom Denee
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry top 5%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Treatment of Major Depression
Papers in
-
- Retinal Development and Disorders 6
-
- Treatment of Major Depression 6
- Co-authors
- Benoît Rive (2 shared papers)Dena H. Jaffe (2 shared papers)Cicely Kerr (5 shared papers)Cornelis L. Mulder (1 shared paper)Thomas R. Einarson (1 shared paper)Mark Lamotte (1 shared paper)Basil G. Bereza (1 shared paper)Jan Sermon (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Value in Health (5 papers)Journal of Affective Disorders (2 papers)BMC Psychiatry (2 papers)Advances in Therapy (2 papers)Journal of Psychiatric Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsFrance
In The Last Decade
Tom Denee
16 papers receiving 263 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Biological Psychiatry 69
- Pharmacology 125
- Psychiatry and Mental health 82
- Behavioral Neuroscience 17
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 44
Countries citing papers authored by Tom Denee
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Denee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Denee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Denee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Denee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Denee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Denee. The network helps show where Tom Denee may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Denee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 153 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 21 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 17 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 0 |
About Tom Denee
Tom Denee is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Social Psychology, Ophthalmology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 21 papers that have together received 266 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (6 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (69 citations), Pharmacology (125 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (82 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (17 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (44 citations). Tom Denee has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and France. Frequent co-authors include Benoît Rive, Dena H. Jaffe, Cicely Kerr, Cornelis L. Mulder, Thomas R. Einarson, Mark Lamotte, Basil G. Bereza, Jan Sermon, Bart Malfait and Pieter Stolk. Their work appears in journals such as Value in Health, Journal of Affective Disorders, BMC Psychiatry, Advances in Therapy and Journal of Psychiatric Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.