Todd Nesbit

21 papers receiving 392 citations

Peers

Todd Nesbit
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 181
  • Family Practice 21
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 17
  • Emergency Medical Services 36
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 21
Replace O. Conort with:
O. Conort France
Michael A. Fotis United States
Heather Ourth United States
Thomas Bookwalter United States
Stephanie Young Canada
Karen E. Bertch United States
Steve Hudson United Kingdom
Thomas De Rijdt Belgium
Sean K Gorman Canada
Lene Juel Kjeldsen Denmark
Todd Nesbit relative to O. Conort France O. Conort's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
O. Conort · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Todd Nesbit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Todd Nesbit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Todd Nesbit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Todd Nesbit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Todd Nesbit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Todd Nesbit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Todd Nesbit. The network helps show where Todd Nesbit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Todd Nesbit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Todd Nesbit Line = papers co-authored together Todd Nesbit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001119
2 200836
3 202029
4 201628
5 201427
6 201527
7 202124
8 201924
9 202321
10 201820
11 202219
12 20137
13 20177
14 20226
15 20116
16 20243
17 20203
18 20203
19 20192
20 20032

About Todd Nesbit

Todd Nesbit is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 21 papers that have together received 414 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (9 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (4 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (3 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (2 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (1 paper), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper) and Hemophilia Treatment and Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (181 citations), Family Practice (21 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (17 citations), Emergency Medical Services (36 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (21 citations). Todd Nesbit has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth M. Shermock, Mandy C. Leonard, Michael Militello, Mary Beth Bobek, Jennifer Long, David A. White, Donna Capozzi, Morton Goldman, Michael B. Streiff and Leigh Efird. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, Annals of Pharmacotherapy and Journal of Pharmacy Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact