O. Conort

32 papers receiving 293 citations

Peers

O. Conort
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 176
  • Toxicology 41
  • Family Practice 17
  • Medical Terminology 2
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 13
Replace Priska Vonbach with:
Priska Vonbach Switzerland
Sabin S Egger Switzerland
Ornella Conort France
Robert M. Balen Canada
Just Ebbesen Norway
A. Clara Drenth‐van Maanen Netherlands
Janet Krska United Kingdom
J. Russell May United States
Todd W. Nesbit United States
Dominik Rottenkolber Germany
O. Conort relative to Priska Vonbach Switzerland Priska Vonbach's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Priska Vonbach · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by O. Conort

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of O. Conort's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by O. Conort with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites O. Conort more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by O. Conort

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by O. Conort. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by O. Conort. The network helps show where O. Conort may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside O. Conort, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with O. Conort Line = papers co-authored together O. Conort links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201468
2
Validation d’un outil de codification des interventions de pharmacie clinique
200448
3 201227
4 200026
5 200723
6 201716
7 201315
8 20148
9 20128
10 20227
11
[Prevention of venous thromboembolism in a non-surgical medical ward. Proposed indications for low molecular weight heparin].
20006
12 20165
13 20155
14 20015
15 20145
16 20074
17 20174
18 20194
19 20154
20 20144

About O. Conort

O. Conort is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Pharmacology, General Health Professions, Transplantation and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 38 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (14 papers), Pharmacy and Medical Practices (6 papers), Healthcare Systems and Practices (5 papers), Health, Medicine and Society (3 papers), Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (3 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers) and Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (176 citations), Toxicology (41 citations), Family Practice (17 citations), Medical Terminology (2 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (13 citations). O. Conort has collaborated with scholars based in France, New Zealand and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include B. Charpiat, Pierrick Bedouch, Michel Juste, Renaud Roubille, Benoît Allenet, B. Allenet, Jean‐Luc Bosson, Pierre François Durieux, G.-R. Auleley and Jean‐Didier Bardet. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, Journal of Crohn s and Colitis, International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, L Encéphale and International Journal of Clinical Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact