Todd Boren

804 citations
22 papers · 635 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Todd Boren

21 papers receiving 629 citations

Peers

Todd Boren
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Cancer Research 334
  • Reproductive Medicine 111
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 70
  • Molecular Biology 431
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 81
Replace Joema Felipe Lima with:
Joema Felipe Lima United States
Eun Mi Je South Korea
Fanling Meng China
Mike Radonovich United States
Rui Gou China
Caroline O. Michie United Kingdom
Zhifei Zu United States
Kei Ihira Japan
Yinhua Yu China
Victoria Heredia-Soto Spain
Todd Boren relative to Joema Felipe Lima United States Joema Felipe Lima's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Joema Felipe Lima · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Todd Boren

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Todd Boren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Todd Boren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Todd Boren more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Todd Boren

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Todd Boren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Todd Boren. The network helps show where Todd Boren may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Todd Boren, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Todd Boren Line = papers co-authored together Todd Boren links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009218
2 2008149
3 2009100
4 200960
5 201129
6 201719
7 201811
8 201211
9 201211
10 20076
11 20104
12 20114
13
Placental site trophoblastic tumor presenting as a friable cervical mass.
20103
14 20162
15 20162
16 20101
17 20161
18 20061
19 20151
20
An update on endometrial cancer.
20101

About Todd Boren

Todd Boren is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Cancer Research, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 635 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (9 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (6 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (5 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (5 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (4 papers), Circular RNAs in diseases (4 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (3 papers) and Uterine Myomas and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (334 citations), Reproductive Medicine (111 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (70 citations), Molecular Biology (431 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (81 citations). Todd Boren has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Johnathan M. Lancaster, Holly K. Dressman, David S. Miller, Siddharth G. Kamath, Ardeshir Hakam, Robert M. Wenham, Dung‐Tsa Chen, Sachin M. Apte, Yin Xiong and Shana N. Wingo. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Clinical Cancer Research and The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact