Toby Roxburgh

761 citations
4 papers · 77 · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

Toby Roxburgh

4 papers receiving 70 citations

Peers

Toby Roxburgh
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Oceanography 19
  • Ecology 40
  • Global and Planetary Change 33
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 14
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 8
Replace Klaus Schrader with:
Klaus Schrader Germany
Margaret Spring United States
Fabián Pina-Amargós Cuba
CIFOR
Kimberly Stephenson Jamaica
Anna M. Chenery United Kingdom
Véronique Le Bihan France
Nadine Bowles-Newark United Kingdom
Erna S. Macusi Philippines
Meli F. Saragi‐Sasmito Indonesia
Toby Roxburgh relative to Klaus Schrader Germany Klaus Schrader's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21×
Klaus Schrader · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Toby Roxburgh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Toby Roxburgh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Toby Roxburgh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Toby Roxburgh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Toby Roxburgh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Toby Roxburgh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Toby Roxburgh. The network helps show where Toby Roxburgh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Toby Roxburgh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Toby Roxburgh Line = papers co-authored together Toby Roxburgh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

4 of 4 papers shown
#Work
1
Status report on the coral reefs of the east coast of peninsula Malaysia
200038
2 202328
3
Global futures: assessing the global economic impacts of environmental change to support policy-making
20209
4
Global Futures: Modelling the Global Economic Impacts of Environmental Change to Support Policy-making - Technical Report
20202

About Toby Roxburgh

Toby Roxburgh is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography, Ecology, Economics and Econometrics and Infectious Diseases, having authored 4 papers that have together received 77 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Land Use and Ecosystem Services (2 papers), Marine and fisheries research (1 paper), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (1 paper), Climate Change Policy and Economics (1 paper), Economic and Environmental Valuation (1 paper) and Marine and coastal plant biology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oceanography (19 citations), Ecology (40 citations), Global and Planetary Change (33 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (14 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (8 citations). Toby Roxburgh has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Douglas Fenner, Simon Harding, Maria Beger, Stephen Polasky, Justin A. Johnson, Uris Lantz C. Baldos, Thomas W. Hertel, Sumil K Thakrar, Erwin Corong and Raffaello Cervigni. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact