T.K. Hames

791 citations
29 papers · 685 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

T.K. Hames

29 papers receiving 611 citations

Peers

T.K. Hames
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Health Information Management 86
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 96
  • Health Informatics 10
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 112
  • Gastroenterology 22
Replace Luiz Otávio Murta with:
Luiz Otávio Murta Brazil
Ingmar Wegner Germany
Ümit Deniz Uluşar Türkiye
Kang‐Ping Lin Taiwan
Masayuki Tanabe Japan
Mark Hastenteufel Germany
Zhenyu Guo Canada
Walter Welkowitz United States
John Wesley Fenner United Kingdom
Selami Serhatlıoğlu Türkiye
T.K. Hames relative to Luiz Otávio Murta Brazil Luiz Otávio Murta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.6×
Luiz Otávio Murta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T.K. Hames

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T.K. Hames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T.K. Hames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T.K. Hames more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T.K. Hames

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T.K. Hames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T.K. Hames. The network helps show where T.K. Hames may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside T.K. Hames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T.K. Hames Line = papers co-authored together T.K. Hames links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992286
2 199259
3 198540
4 199240
5 198235
6 198032
7 198230
8 198423
9 199123
10 198521
11 198510
12 199210
13 19909
14 19818
15 19918
16 19857
17 19937
18 19805
19 19865
20 19904

About T.K. Hames

T.K. Hames is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 29 papers that have together received 685 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (6 papers), Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography (5 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (3 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (3 papers), Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors (2 papers), Peripheral Artery Disease Management (2 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (2 papers) and Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (86 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (96 citations), Health Informatics (10 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (112 citations) and Gastroenterology (22 citations). T.K. Hames has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Barry H. Blott, Anna Senft Miller, Keith N. Humphries, Anthony D.B. Chant, Carl D Burgess, C. F. George, Nicola C. Austin, Patrick J. Gallagher, John S. Fleming and Stephen W. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, Cardiovascular Research, British Journal of Radiology, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry and British journal of surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact