Tin-Chi Lin

15 papers receiving 346 citations

Peers

Tin-Chi Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Gender Studies 74
  • Demography 50
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 15
  • Occupational Therapy 11
  • Aging 4
Replace Érika Arantes de Oliveira‐Cardoso with:
Érika Arantes de Oliveira‐Cardoso Brazil
Wendy W. Huebner United States
Cara L. Brown Canada
Nedelina Tchangalova United States
Kaye Smith United States
Margaret S. Pichardo United States
Juliana Pedro Portugal
Wayne R. Gillett New Zealand
Eline Dancet Belgium
Janiece L. Walker United States
Tin-Chi Lin relative to Érika Arantes de Oliveira‐Cardoso Brazil Érika Arantes de Oliveira‐Cardoso's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Érika Arantes de Oliveira‐Cardoso · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tin-Chi Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tin-Chi Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tin-Chi Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tin-Chi Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tin-Chi Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tin-Chi Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tin-Chi Lin. The network helps show where Tin-Chi Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tin-Chi Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tin-Chi Lin Line = papers co-authored together Tin-Chi Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 200961
2 202455
3 201348
4 201533
5 201331
6 202131
7 201430
8 201329
9 202216
10 20168
11 20226
12 20244
13 20213
14 20233
15 20241
16 20220

About Tin-Chi Lin

Tin-Chi Lin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Immunology, Gender Studies and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 16 papers that have together received 359 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis (3 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (2 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (2 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (2 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (1 paper), Migration and Labor Dynamics (1 paper), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (1 paper) and Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (74 citations), Demography (50 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (15 citations), Occupational Therapy (11 citations) and Aging (4 citations). Tin-Chi Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Santosh K. Verma, Theodore K. Courtney, Helen Marucci‐Wellman, Joanna Willetts, Melanye J. Brennan, Alı́cia Adserà, David A. Lombardi, Robert R. McLean, Blessing Dube and Clinton Enos. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, American Journal of Public Health, Nature Communications, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology and Journal of Dermatological Treatment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact