Journal of Dermatological Treatment

3.2k papers and 41.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.2k papers published in Journal of Dermatological Treatment in the last decades have received a total of 41.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Dermatological Treatment usually cover Dermatology (1.9k papers), Immunology (914 papers) and Epidemiology (742 papers) specifically the topics of Dermatology and Skin Diseases (1.0k papers), Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis (772 papers) and Nail Diseases and Treatments (342 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Dermatological Treatment are Steven R. Feldman, Noah Scheinfeld, John Koo, Alice B. Gottlieb, Aditya K. Gupta, P.C.M. van de Kerkhof, Alan B. Fleischer, Jashin J. Wu, Michael J. Cork and J. Berth‐Jones.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Dermatological Treatment

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Dermatological Treatment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Dermatological Treatment.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Dermatological Treatment

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Dermatological Treatment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Dermatological Treatment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Dermatological Treatment more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025