Tim Woolley
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Family Practice top 10%
Papers in
- History 5
- Mormonism, Religion, and History 4
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 4
- Co-authors
- Paul A. Estabrooks (2 shared papers)Deanna Kurz (2 shared papers)Lisa A. Strycker (2 shared papers)Deborah J. Toobert (2 shared papers)Russell E. Glasgow (2 shared papers)Diane K. King (2 shared papers)Steven M. Christiansen (1 shared paper)Milagra S Tyler (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Nicotine & Tobacco Research (1 paper)Patient Education and Counseling (1 paper)Internet Interventions (1 paper)Journal of Medical Internet Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNorway
In The Last Decade
Tim Woolley
5 papers receiving 425 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Applied Psychology 66
- Family Practice 14
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 106
- General Health Professions 143
- Physiology 48
Countries citing papers authored by Tim Woolley
This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Woolley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Woolley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Woolley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Woolley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Woolley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Woolley. The network helps show where Tim Woolley may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Tim Woolley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 177 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 161 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 78 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 0 |
About Tim Woolley
Tim Woolley is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations, Religious studies, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 11 papers that have together received 434 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mormonism, Religion, and History (4 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (2 papers), Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (2 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (1 paper), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (1 paper), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (1 paper) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (66 citations), Family Practice (14 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (106 citations), General Health Professions (143 citations) and Physiology (48 citations). Tim Woolley has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Paul A. Estabrooks, Deanna Kurz, Lisa A. Strycker, Deborah J. Toobert, Russell E. Glasgow, Diane K. King, Steven M. Christiansen, Milagra S Tyler, John R. Seeley and Brian G. Danaher. Their work appears in journals such as Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Patient Education and Counseling, Internet Interventions and Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.