Tim Theeboom
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Coaching Methods and Impact
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy
- Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Mentoring and Academic Development
Papers in
-
- Coaching Methods and Impact 5
-
- Ego Development and Educational Practices 2
- Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics 2
- Psychological Treatments and Assessments 1
- Co-authors
- Annelies E. M. Van Vianen (7 shared papers)Bianca Beersma (5 shared papers)Anne de Pagter (3 shared papers)Jessie Koen (3 shared papers)Matthijs de Hoog (3 shared papers)Jonathan Passmore (1 shared paper)Robert J. Zwitser (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BMJ Open (2 papers)Frontiers in Psychology (2 papers)The Journal of Positive Psychology (2 papers)Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (1 paper)VU Research Portal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsPortugalUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Tim Theeboom
9 papers receiving 532 citations
Tim Theeboom's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Applied Psychology 285
- Social Psychology 333
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 111
- Clinical Psychology 189
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 107
Countries citing papers authored by Tim Theeboom
This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Theeboom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Theeboom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Theeboom more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Theeboom
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Theeboom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Theeboom. The network helps show where Tim Theeboom may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Tim Theeboom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 490 |
| 2 | 2015 | 29 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 2 |
About Tim Theeboom
Tim Theeboom is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Education, having authored 9 papers that have together received 601 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coaching Methods and Impact (5 papers), Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (3 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Ego Development and Educational Practices (2 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (2 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (2 papers), Psychological Treatments and Assessments (1 paper) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (285 citations), Social Psychology (333 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (111 citations), Clinical Psychology (189 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (107 citations). Tim Theeboom has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Portugal and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Annelies E. M. Van Vianen, Bianca Beersma, Anne de Pagter, Jessie Koen, Matthijs de Hoog, Jonathan Passmore and Robert J. Zwitser. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Frontiers in Psychology, The Journal of Positive Psychology, Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) and VU Research Portal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.