Tim Stoeckel

498 citations
29 papers · 297 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Tim Stoeckel

27 papers receiving 285 citations

Peers

Tim Stoeckel
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 266
  • Language and Linguistics 126
  • Artificial Intelligence 209
  • Literature and Literary Theory 38
  • Health Informatics 2
Replace Oliver James Ballance with:
Oliver James Ballance New Zealand
Tina Waldman Israel
Dale Brown Japan
Jeremy Ward Thailand
Ronan Brown Thailand
Angela Joe New Zealand
Stefania Spina Italy
Thomas Cobb Canada
Agnieszka Leńko‐Szymańska Poland
Íde O’Sullivan Ireland
Tim Stoeckel relative to Oliver James Ballance New Zealand Oliver James Ballance's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Oliver James Ballance · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Stoeckel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Stoeckel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Stoeckel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Stoeckel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Stoeckel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Stoeckel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Stoeckel. The network helps show where Tim Stoeckel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Tim Stoeckel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim Stoeckel Line = papers co-authored together Tim Stoeckel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202060
2 202041
3 201227
4 201826
5 202121
6 201919
7 201617
8 201512
9 20219
10 20217
11 20167
12 20136
13 20176
14 20216
15 20245
16 20234
17 20214
18 20184
19
High-Frequency and Academic English Vocabulary Growth Among First-Year Students at UNP
20182
20 20232

About Tim Stoeckel

Tim Stoeckel is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory and General Health Professions, having authored 29 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Second Language Acquisition and Learning (26 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (22 papers), Text Readability and Simplification (12 papers), Lexicography and Language Studies (5 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (2 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (2 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers) and Educational Technology and Assessment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (266 citations), Language and Linguistics (126 citations), Artificial Intelligence (209 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (38 citations) and Health Informatics (2 citations). Tim Stoeckel has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, New Zealand and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Stuart McLean, Paul Nation, Jeffrey Stewart, Dale Brown, Phillip R. Bennett, Yuko Matsumoto, Brandon Kramer, Amanda Müller, James Rogers and Howard G. Brown. Their work appears in journals such as System, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, TESOL Quarterly, Applied Linguistics and English for Specific Purposes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact