Tim M. Gale

3.4k citations
78 papers · 2.4k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Tim M. Gale

73 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Tim M. Gale
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Medical Terminology 14
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 519
  • Clinical Psychology 660
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 586
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 361
Replace Shinsuke Koike with:
Shinsuke Koike Japan
Jennifer Urbano Blackford United States
Daniel Widlöcher France
David A. Kareken United States
Armin Scheurich Germany
Madeleine S. Goodkind United States
Oezguer A. Onur Germany
Amanda Bischoff‐Grethe United States
Anya Pedersen Germany
Lynn McInnes United Kingdom
Tim M. Gale relative to Shinsuke Koike Japan Shinsuke Koike's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Shinsuke Koike · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim M. Gale

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim M. Gale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim M. Gale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim M. Gale more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim M. Gale

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim M. Gale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim M. Gale. The network helps show where Tim M. Gale may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tim M. Gale, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim M. Gale Line = papers co-authored together Tim M. Gale links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016233
2 2002220
3 2012205
4 2005156
5 2018155
6 200982
7 200580
8 201270
9 201366
10 200761
11 200554
12 200352
13 200245
14 200943
15 200543
16 200340
17 200640
18 200237
19 200936
20 201335

About Tim M. Gale

Tim M. Gale is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 78 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (14 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (8 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (8 papers), Face and Expression Recognition (6 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (6 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (4 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Terminology (14 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (519 citations), Clinical Psychology (660 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (586 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (361 citations). Tim M. Gale has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Keith R. Laws, Karen Irvine, Naomi Fineberg, T. Sivakumaran, Christopher J. Hawley, Tejinder K. Kondel, Verity C. Leeson, Jules Angst, Michael P. Hengartner and Wulf Rössler. Their work appears in journals such as Brain and Cognition, Cortex, Journal of Mental Health, PLoS ONE and Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact