Tim Kaiser

35 papers receiving 535 citations

Peers

Tim Kaiser
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 308
  • Applied Psychology 121
  • Biological Psychiatry 45
  • Clinical Psychology 199
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 151
Replace Daifeng Dong with:
Daifeng Dong China
Simone Verhagen Netherlands
Keith Bredemeier United States
Xiao-Lan Cao Australia
Carter J. Funkhouser United States
Anahit Mkrtchian United Kingdom
Robin N. Groen Netherlands
Joanne Goodall Australia
Anna Bevan United Kingdom
Taryn G. Moss Canada
Tim Kaiser relative to Daifeng Dong China Daifeng Dong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Daifeng Dong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Kaiser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Kaiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Kaiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Kaiser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Kaiser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Kaiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Kaiser. The network helps show where Tim Kaiser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tim Kaiser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim Kaiser Line = papers co-authored together Tim Kaiser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021163
2 202238
3 202232
4 202228
5 201924
6 202121
7 201919
8 202217
9 202016
10 201816
11 201815
12 202314
13 202013
14 201712
15 202211
16 202110
17 202110
18 201810
19 20239
20 20248

About Tim Kaiser

Tim Kaiser is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pharmacology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 545 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (21 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (7 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (308 citations), Applied Psychology (121 citations), Biological Psychiatry (45 citations), Clinical Psychology (199 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (151 citations). Tim Kaiser has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Philipp Herzog, Eva‐Lotta Brakemeier, Ulrich Voderholzer, Anton‐Rupert Laireiter, Julia Reichenberger, Jens Blechert, Pim Cuijpers, Tom Booth, Marco Del Giudice and Eirini Karyotaki. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, Psychotherapy Research, Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity and JAMA Network Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact