Tim C. van de Grift

65 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Tim C. van de Grift
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Social Psychology 955
  • Reproductive Medicine 183
  • Clinical Psychology 369
  • Gender Studies 164
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 170
Replace Eva Van Caenegem with:
Eva Van Caenegem Belgium
Katrien Wierckx Belgium
Gunter Heylens Belgium
Ian T. Nolan United States
Hertha Richter‐Appelt Germany
Els Elaut Belgium
Justine Schober United States
Cecilia Dhejne Sweden
Jos Megens Netherlands
Lih‐Mei Liao United Kingdom
Tim C. van de Grift relative to Eva Van Caenegem Belgium Eva Van Caenegem's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Eva Van Caenegem · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim C. van de Grift

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim C. van de Grift's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim C. van de Grift with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim C. van de Grift more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim C. van de Grift

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim C. van de Grift. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim C. van de Grift. The network helps show where Tim C. van de Grift may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tim C. van de Grift, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim C. van de Grift Line = papers co-authored together Tim C. van de Grift links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017153
2 2016134
3 2015133
4 2017108
5 201893
6 201989
7 201778
8 202269
9 201668
10 201667
11 201863
12 201853
13 201950
14 201748
15 201947
16 201843
17 201841
18 201937
19 202037
20 202036

About Tim C. van de Grift

Tim C. van de Grift is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery and Clinical Psychology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (32 papers), Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (16 papers), Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues (5 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (5 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (5 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (5 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (4 papers) and Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (955 citations), Reproductive Medicine (183 citations), Clinical Psychology (369 citations), Gender Studies (164 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (170 citations). Tim C. van de Grift has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Baudewijntje P.C. Kreukels, Margriet G. Mullender, Mark‐Bram Bouman, Els Elaut, Peggy T. Cohen‐Kettenis, Susanne Cerwenka, Lian Elfering, Garry L.S. Pigot, Müjde Özer and Marlon E. Buncamper. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Sexual Medicine, International Journal of Transgender Health, Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery and EClinicalMedicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact