Thomas Zemb

166 papers receiving 6.2k citations

Peers

Thomas Zemb
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Filtration and Separation 624
  • Organic Chemistry 3.4k
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 1.0k
  • Catalysis 467
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 318
Replace Pierandrea Lo Nostro with:
Pierandrea Lo Nostro Italy
Isabelle Grillo France
Dominik Horinek Germany
Didier Touraud Germany
Richard K. Heenan United Kingdom
Kōzō Shinoda Japan
Jeffery A. Aguiar United States
Nobuyuki Matubayasi Japan
José R. B. Gomes Portugal
Franz Grieser Australia
Thomas Zemb relative to Pierandrea Lo Nostro Italy Pierandrea Lo Nostro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Pierandrea Lo Nostro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Zemb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Zemb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Zemb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Zemb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Zemb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Zemb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Zemb. The network helps show where Thomas Zemb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Zemb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Zemb Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Zemb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 171 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990366
2 1985239
3 2006233
4 1985193
5 2016181
6 2016168
7 2021162
8 2007128
9 2004116
10 2014108
11 1992106
12 1998104
13 2012103
14 198893
15 198992
16 200789
17 201386
18 199085
19 200881
20 198281

About Thomas Zemb

Thomas Zemb is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Molecular Biology, having authored 171 papers that have together received 6.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (101 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (51 papers), Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (29 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (20 papers), Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions (19 papers), Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization (19 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (18 papers) and Extraction and Separation Processes (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Filtration and Separation (624 citations), Organic Chemistry (3.4k citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (1.0k citations), Catalysis (467 citations) and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (318 citations). Thomas Zemb has collaborated with scholars based in France, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Werner Kunz, Yves Chevalier, Luc Belloni, Monique Dubois, Jean‐François Dufrêche, Olivier Diat, Didier Touraud, Christophe Petit, Marie‐Paule Pileni and Barry W. Ninham. Their work appears in journals such as Langmuir, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B and Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact