Thomas Wüst

47 papers receiving 768 citations

Peers

Thomas Wüst
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Condensed Matter Physics 389
  • Mathematical Physics 134
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 101
  • Materials Chemistry 281
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 52
Replace A. M. Nemirovsky with:
A. M. Nemirovsky United States
D P Foster France
Nathan Clisby Australia
Jürgen F. Stilck Brazil
C E Soteros Canada
S. Stepanow Germany
I. Majid United States
A. Caillé Canada
Gérard Jannink France
Michael J. Skaug United States
Thomas Wüst relative to A. M. Nemirovsky United States A. M. Nemirovsky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.3×
A. M. Nemirovsky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Wüst

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Wüst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Wüst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Wüst more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Wüst

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Wüst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Wüst. The network helps show where Thomas Wüst may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Wüst, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Wüst Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Wüst links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013100
2 200971
3 201070
4 201457
5 200845
6 201241
7 201337
8 201535
9 201130
10 201127
11 200821
12 201420
13 200920
14 201417
15
Applying the 3D DIS DILAS to Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Projects - Requirements and First Results
200417
16 200416
17 200715
18 201213
19 200511
20 200410

About Thomas Wüst

Thomas Wüst is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 50 papers that have together received 775 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theoretical and Computational Physics (22 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (20 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (9 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (9 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (8 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (4 papers) and nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (389 citations), Mathematical Physics (134 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (101 citations), Materials Chemistry (281 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (52 citations). Thomas Wüst has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include D. P. Landau, Ying Wai Li, Thomas Vogel, Daniel Seaton, J. Hulliger, Claire Gervais, Peter Virnau, Ying Xu, Stephan Nebiker and Julio Cesar Martinez-Garcia. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Physics Communications, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Physical Review Letters, Zeitschrift für Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials and Crystal Growth & Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact