Thomas Wong

105 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Thomas Wong
Comparison fields: 5 of 183
  • Research and Theory 93
  • Leadership and Management 47
  • Emergency Medical Services 197
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 24
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 26
Replace Hamid Haghani with:
Hamid Haghani Iran
Soghrat Faghihzadeh Iran
Maria Grazia De Marinis Italy
Joanne W. Y. Chung Hong Kong
Fiona Bogossian Australia
Andrew Long United Kingdom
Holly Blake United Kingdom
Sarah Kelly United Kingdom
Marianne Wallis Australia
Luíz Carlos de Abreu Brazil
Thomas Wong relative to Hamid Haghani Iran Hamid Haghani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Hamid Haghani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Wong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Wong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Wong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Wong. The network helps show where Thomas Wong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Wong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Wong Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Wong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 112 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005265
2 2001157
3 2007128
4 2006127
5 2001123
6 2005105
7 200694
8 201486
9 200584
10 200280
11 200276
12 201674
13 200667
14 200767
15 199966
16 201863
17 200562
18 200656
19 200755
20 200453

About Thomas Wong

Thomas Wong is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology, Physiology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 112 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (5 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (5 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (5 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (5 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (5 papers), Sleep and related disorders (5 papers) and Cultural Competency in Health Care (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (93 citations), Leadership and Management (47 citations), Emergency Medical Services (197 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (24 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (26 citations). Thomas Wong has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Joanne W. Y. Chung, Lorna Kwai Ping Suen, Esther Mok, Yi Li, Edward Newton, Alex W. K. Chan, Gary Cheung, Yun‐Fang Tsai, June Liu and Ida M. Martinson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Nurse Education Today, Contemporary Nurse, International Journal of Nursing Sciences and International Journal of Nursing Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact