Thomas Wanner

1.5k citations
61 papers · 830 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Wanner

59 papers receiving 719 citations

Peers

Thomas Wanner
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 396
  • Mathematical Physics 132
  • Numerical Analysis 71
  • Condensed Matter Physics 114
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 109
Replace L. C. Evans with:
L. C. Evans United States
Matteo Novaga Italy
Rustum Choksi Canada
Tony Shardlow United Kingdom
Francisco Guillén‐González Spain
Xavier Blanc France
Helmut Abels Germany
Giorgio Fusco Italy
Luciano Modica Italy
Thomas Wanner relative to L. C. Evans United States L. C. Evans's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
L. C. Evans · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Wanner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Wanner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Wanner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Wanner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Wanner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Wanner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Wanner. The network helps show where Thomas Wanner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Wanner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Wanner Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Wanner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200466
2 200048
3 199843
4 200839
5 200135
6 200734
7 200730
8 200030
9 200429
10 199928
11 200026
12 200925
13 201021
14 199720
15 200018
16 201018
17 201618
18 200318
19 200316
20 200916

About Thomas Wanner

Thomas Wanner is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Materials Chemistry, Mathematical Physics, Condensed Matter Physics and Computational Mechanics, having authored 61 papers that have together received 830 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Solidification and crystal growth phenomena (20 papers), Topological and Geometric Data Analysis (16 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (16 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (13 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (8 papers), Block Copolymer Self-Assembly (7 papers), nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (6 papers) and Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (396 citations), Mathematical Physics (132 citations), Numerical Analysis (71 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (114 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (109 citations). Thomas Wanner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Stanislaus Maier‐Paape, Evelyn Sander, Konstantin Mischaikow, Dirk Blömker, Marian Mrożek, Bernd Aulbach, Marcio Gameiro, Paweł Dłotko, William D. Kalies and Edwin R. Fuller. Their work appears in journals such as Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena, The Journal of Difference Equations and Applications and Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact