Thomas Sturm

2.5k citations
93 papers · 1.8k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Sturm

88 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Thomas Sturm
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 750
  • Inorganic Chemistry 398
  • Software 85
  • Organic Chemistry 501
  • Numerical Analysis 75
Replace Michael Albert with:
Michael Albert New Zealand
Xiao-Dong ZHANG China
Andries E. Brouwer Netherlands
Yongtang Shi China
Willem H. Haemers Netherlands
Keith H. Randall United States
Russell Merris United States
Tomaž Pisanski Slovenia
Slobodan Simić Serbia
Steve Kirkland Canada
Thomas Sturm relative to Michael Albert New Zealand Michael Albert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×28.3×
Michael Albert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Sturm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Sturm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Sturm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Sturm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Sturm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Sturm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Sturm. The network helps show where Thomas Sturm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Sturm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Sturm Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Sturm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 93 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997263
2 2003195
3 201485
4 199978
5 199767
6 200466
7 196563
8 199861
9 200256
10 201155
11 199851
12 199846
13 196545
14 201540
15 200034
16 200932
17 200832
18 200029
19 200128
20 200225

About Thomas Sturm

Thomas Sturm is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Inorganic Chemistry, Organic Chemistry and Geometry and Topology, having authored 93 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Polynomial and algebraic computation (26 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (24 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (18 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (13 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (11 papers), Numerical Methods and Algorithms (10 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (8 papers) and Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (750 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (398 citations), Software (85 citations), Organic Chemistry (501 citations) and Numerical Analysis (75 citations). Thomas Sturm has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Dolzmann, Walter Weissensteiner, Felix Spindler, Volker Weispfenning, Travis I. Thompson, Félix A. Jalón, Blanca R. Manzano, Andreas Weber⋆, Andreas Seidl and Luís F. Ramos. Their work appears in journals such as Organometallics, Lecture notes in computer science, CHIMIA International Journal for Chemistry, Journal of Organometallic Chemistry and SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact