Thomas Strobl

39 papers receiving 641 citations

Peers

Thomas Strobl
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Algebra and Number Theory 202
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 495
  • Mathematical Physics 329
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 354
  • Geometry and Topology 184
Replace Urs Schreiber with:
Urs Schreiber United States
Ugo Bruzzo Italy
Alexey Sharapov Russia
José Izquierdo Spain
Louis Crane United States
Paolo Aschieri Italy
A. Losev Russia
Maxim Zabzine Sweden
Gregg J. Zuckerman United States
Shi-shyr Roan Taiwan
Thomas Strobl relative to Urs Schreiber United States Urs Schreiber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Urs Schreiber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Strobl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Strobl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Strobl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Strobl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Strobl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Strobl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Strobl. The network helps show where Thomas Strobl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Strobl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Strobl Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Strobl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199670
2 200260
3 200552
4 200442
5 199736
6 201434
7 199732
8 200431
9 199429
10 201821
11 201921
12 200919
13 199517
14 201416
15 201515
16 200015
17 200414
18 199313
19 202011
20 201311

About Thomas Strobl

Thomas Strobl is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Mathematical Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 41 papers that have together received 670 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (33 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (24 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (18 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (13 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (12 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (8 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (7 papers) and Advanced Differential Geometry Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (202 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (495 citations), Mathematical Physics (329 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (354 citations) and Geometry and Topology (184 citations). Thomas Strobl has collaborated with scholars based in France, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Alexei Kotov, C. Klimčı́k, Anton Alekseev, Martin Bojowald, C. Mayer, Anton Alekseev, Noriaki Ikeda, Henning Samtleben, Athanasios Chatzistavrakidis and H.A. Kastrup. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geometry and Physics, Journal of High Energy Physics, Classical and Quantum Gravity, Communications in Mathematical Physics and Physical review. D.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact