Thomas Simpatico

27 papers receiving 687 citations

Peers

Thomas Simpatico
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 198
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 231
  • Pharmacology 134
  • Biological Psychiatry 16
  • Clinical Psychology 129
Replace Kirsty E. Scholes‐Balog with:
Kirsty E. Scholes‐Balog Australia
Silke Kühn Germany
Oleg V Tcheremissine United States
Hae‐Kook Lee South Korea
Rohan H. C. Palmer United States
Catherine McGregor Australia
Meghan E. Martz United States
P. Gaszner Hungary
Liana R.N. Schreiber United States
Jane Fried United States
Thomas Simpatico relative to Kirsty E. Scholes‐Balog Australia Kirsty E. Scholes‐Balog's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Kirsty E. Scholes‐Balog · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Simpatico

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Simpatico's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Simpatico with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Simpatico more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Simpatico

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Simpatico. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Simpatico. The network helps show where Thomas Simpatico may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Simpatico, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Simpatico Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Simpatico links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008117
2 201487
3 201283
4 201436
5 201535
6 199733
7 201629
8 201328
9 201527
10 200527
11 201126
12 202223
13 201920
14 201320
15 200520
16 201620
17 202119
18 201517
19 200113
20 201812

About Thomas Simpatico

Thomas Simpatico is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 730 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (8 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (7 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (198 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (231 citations), Pharmacology (134 citations), Biological Psychiatry (16 citations) and Clinical Psychology (129 citations). Thomas Simpatico has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth Blum, Marlene Oscar‐Berman, Marcelo Febo, Mark S. Gold, John Giordano, Eric R. Braverman, David Han, John Femino, Rajendra D. Badgaiyan and Mary Hauser. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatric Services, PLoS ONE, Molecular Neurobiology, Journal of Behavioral Addictions and Journal of Personalized Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact