David E. Smith

65 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

David E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Anatomy 55
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 97
  • Biochemistry 108
  • Neurology 70
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 133
Replace Kleber Gomes Franchini with:
Kleber Gomes Franchini Brazil
Michael L. Freedman United States
DOROTHY BERLIN GAIL United States
Nicolas von Ahsen Germany
Raymonde Szargel Israel
K. van Ackern Germany
Alexander Mark Weber Canada
James R. Spivey United States
Yuhei Hamasaki Japan
Susan J. Allison Australia
David E. Smith relative to Kleber Gomes Franchini Brazil Kleber Gomes Franchini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×18.3×
Kleber Gomes Franchini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David E. Smith. The network helps show where David E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together David E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Crystalloid vs. colloid resuscitation: is one better? A randomized clinical study.
1979187
2 1972173
3 2019116
4 200082
5 199872
6 195671
7 197671
8 195659
9 200050
10 198546
11 196144
12 195339
13 199338
14 200538
15 199337
16 195535
17 195633
18 195631
19 195828
20 195927

About David E. Smith

David E. Smith is a scholar working on Anatomy, Pharmacology, Biochemistry, Oncology and Toxicology, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (7 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (5 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (5 papers), Medical and Biological Sciences (5 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (4 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (4 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (3 papers) and Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anatomy (55 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (97 citations), Biochemistry (108 citations), Neurology (70 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (133 citations). David E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Eli Robins, Richard W. Virgilio, Charles L. Rice, Christopher K. Zarins, Donald R. Wesson, Richard M. Peters, Matthias A. Hediger, Lothar L. Salomon, Richard E. McCaman and Xing‐Zhen Chen. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Surgery, Journal of Neurochemistry, American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Cancer and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact