Thomas Schultz

4.1k citations
82 papers · 3.5k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Schultz

81 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

Thomas Schultz
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 1.2k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.7k
  • Spectroscopy 716
  • Biochemistry 137
  • Food Science 341
Replace Antonie J. W. G. Visser with:
Antonie J. W. G. Visser Netherlands
H. L. Casal Canada
Rodney L. Biltonen United States
Arie van Hoek Netherlands
Michael Schindler Germany
Göran Lindblom Sweden
Issei Harada Japan
Marta Pasenkiewicz‐Gierula Poland
P. T. T. Wong Canada
Rufus Lumry United States
Thomas Schultz relative to Antonie J. W. G. Visser Netherlands Antonie J. W. G. Visser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Antonie J. W. G. Visser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Schultz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Schultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Schultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Schultz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Schultz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Schultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Schultz. The network helps show where Thomas Schultz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Schultz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Schultz Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Schultz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004321
2 2003302
3 2004301
4 1977288
5 1967239
6 2004178
7 2001143
8 2010115
9 200590
10 200985
11 200566
12 201261
13 200258
14 200055
15 200953
16 201347
17 199841
18 199239
19 197138
20 201836

About Thomas Schultz

Thomas Schultz is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Organic Chemistry and Food Science, having authored 82 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (32 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (25 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (23 papers), Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (10 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (9 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (8 papers) and DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (1.2k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.7k citations), Spectroscopy (716 citations), Biochemistry (137 citations) and Food Science (341 citations). Thomas Schultz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Albert Stolow, Marek Z. Zgierski, Susanne Ullrich, Robert A. Flath, Elena Samoylova, I. V. Hertel, W. Radloff, Roy Teranishi, T. R. Mon and Ingo Fischer. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and The Journal of Physical Chemistry A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact