Thomas Richards
Impact in
- Museology top 2%
-
- Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Papers in
-
- Polish Historical and Cultural Studies 2
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 1
- Co-authors
- Peter d'A. Jones (1 shared paper)David Henige (1 shared paper)Andrew C. Isenberg (1 shared paper)Clive Sanford (1 shared paper)Robert Skelly (1 shared paper)Michael Goddard (1 shared paper)Tom Dutton (1 shared paper)Bruno David (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Pacific Historical Review (1 paper)Nature (1 paper)The International Journal of African Historical Studies (1 paper)Representations (1 paper)The American Historical Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanAustralia
In The Last Decade
Thomas Richards
11 papers receiving 343 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Museology 62
- Literature and Literary Theory 179
- Space and Planetary Science 19
- Anthropology 131
- Conservation 43
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Richards
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Richards's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Richards with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Richards more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Richards
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Richards. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Richards. The network helps show where Thomas Richards may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Richards, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Imperial Archive: Knowledge and the Fantasy of Empire | 1993 | 375 |
| 2 | 1992 | 200 | |
| 3 | 1992 | 33 | |
| 4 | Heart of Practice: Within the Workcenter of Jerzy Grotowski and Thomas Richards | 2008 | 16 |
| 5 | The Meaning of Star Trek | 1997 | 8 |
| 6 | 1995 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 1 |
About Thomas Richards
Thomas Richards is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 11 papers that have together received 651 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Polish Historical and Cultural Studies (2 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (1 paper), American History and Culture (1 paper), Online and Blended Learning (1 paper), Educational Research and Pedagogy (1 paper), Polish-Jewish Holocaust Memory Studies (1 paper), American Environmental and Regional History (1 paper) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Museology (62 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (179 citations), Space and Planetary Science (19 citations), Anthropology (131 citations) and Conservation (43 citations). Thomas Richards has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Peter d'A. Jones, David Henige, Andrew C. Isenberg, Clive Sanford, Robert Skelly, Michael Goddard, Tom Dutton, Bruno David and Matthew Leavesley. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Historical Review, Nature, The International Journal of African Historical Studies, Representations and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.