Critical Criminology

702 papers and 6.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 702 papers published in Critical Criminology in the last decades have received a total of 6.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Critical Criminology usually cover Sociology and Political Science (548 papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (231 papers) and Clinical Psychology (115 papers) specifically the topics of Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (231 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (225 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (202 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Critical Criminology are Nigel South, Hillary Potter, Avi Brisman, Vincenzo Ruggiero, Ragnhild Sollund, Dawn L. Rothe, Michael J. Lynch, Jeff Ferrell, Natalie J. Sokoloff and Travis Linnemann.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Critical Criminology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Critical Criminology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Critical Criminology.

Countries where authors publish in Critical Criminology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Critical Criminology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Critical Criminology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Critical Criminology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025