Thomas Quail
Impact in
-
- Vitamin D Research Studies
-
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- RNA Research and Splicing
- DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- DNA Repair Mechanisms
Papers in
-
- DNA Repair Mechanisms 1
- Ion channel regulation and function 1
-
- Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation 2
- Co-authors
- Jan Brugués (2 shared papers)Stefan Golfier (1 shared paper)Hiroshi Kimurâ (1 shared paper)Leon Glass (5 shared papers)Alvin Shrier (3 shared papers)Loan Nguyen‐Yamamoto (1 shared paper)V. Dimitrov (1 shared paper)Beum‐Soo An (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Thomas Quail
9 papers receiving 438 citations
Thomas Quail's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 66
- Molecular Biology 263
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 39
- Oncology 49
- Genetics 46
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Quail
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Quail's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Quail with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Quail more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Quail
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Quail. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Quail. The network helps show where Thomas Quail may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Quail, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 151 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 94 | |
| 3 | PARP1-DNA co-condensation drives DNA repair site assembly to prevent disjunction of broken DNA ends Hit paper breakdown → | 2024 | 89 |
| 4 | 2015 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2025 | 4 |
About Thomas Quail
Thomas Quail is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Computer Networks and Communications, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Economics and Econometrics and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 9 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (2 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (2 papers), stochastic dynamics and bifurcation (2 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper), DNA Repair Mechanisms (1 paper), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper) and Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (66 citations), Molecular Biology (263 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (39 citations), Oncology (49 citations) and Genetics (46 citations). Thomas Quail has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Germany and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Jan Brugués, Stefan Golfier, Hiroshi Kimurâ, Leon Glass, Alvin Shrier, Loan Nguyen‐Yamamoto, V. Dimitrov, Beum‐Soo An, John H. White and Reyhaneh Salehi-Tabar. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Molecular Cell, Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, Cell and Physical Review Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.