Thomas Polzin

907 citations
13 papers · 543 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Polzin

13 papers receiving 486 citations

Peers

Thomas Polzin
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 286
  • Signal Processing 201
  • Artificial Intelligence 294
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 137
  • Pharmacy 27
Replace Anna Polychroniou with:
Anna Polychroniou United States
Lukas Stappen Germany
Emad Barsoum United States
Raymond Brueckner Germany
Zhaocheng Huang Australia
Najmeh Sadoughi United States
Joy Nicholson United Kingdom
Richard Huber Germany
Thomas Polzin relative to Anna Polychroniou United States Anna Polychroniou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Anna Polychroniou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Polzin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Polzin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Polzin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Polzin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Polzin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Polzin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Polzin. The network helps show where Thomas Polzin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Polzin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Polzin Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Polzin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2002316
2 200063
3 199333
4 200229
5 201527
6 200217
7 202115
8
Combining Automatic Landmark Detection and Variational Methods for Lung CT Registration
201315
9
Towards Spontaneous Speech Translation
199410
10 199810
11 20145
12 20022
13
INFERRING DISCOURSE STRUCTURE FROM SPEECH
19981

About Thomas Polzin

Thomas Polzin is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 13 papers that have together received 543 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Speech and dialogue systems (6 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (5 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (2 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (2 papers), Topic Modeling (2 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (1 paper) and Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (286 citations), Signal Processing (201 citations), Artificial Intelligence (294 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (137 citations) and Pharmacy (27 citations). Thomas Polzin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Alex Waibel, Frank Dellaert, Alexander Waibel, Masaru Tomita, Carolyn Penstein Rosé, Jan Modersitzki, Monika Woszczyna, Noah Coccaro, Ivica Rogina and Stefan Heldmann. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Methods of Information in Medicine, Academic Pediatrics, Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) and International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact