Thomas Pitcher
Impact in
- Physiology top 10%
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Rheumatology top 10%
- Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Papers in
-
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments 9
-
- Nerve injury and regeneration 2
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology 2
- Co-authors
- Marzia Malcangio (9 shared papers)João de Sousa Valente (2 shared papers)Valentina Vacca (2 shared papers)Raffaele Simeoli (2 shared papers)Karli Montague-Cardoso (2 shared papers)Hadil Alahdal (1 shared paper)David Chambers (1 shared paper)Hefin Jones (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Pain (2 papers)Journal of Visualized Experiments (2 papers)European Journal of Pain (1 paper)Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (1 paper)Brain Behavior and Immunity (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwedenItaly
In The Last Decade
Thomas Pitcher
14 papers receiving 656 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Physiology 268
- Rheumatology 144
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 151
- Sensory Systems 35
- Neurology 54
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Pitcher
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Pitcher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Pitcher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Pitcher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Pitcher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Pitcher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Pitcher. The network helps show where Thomas Pitcher may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Pitcher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 242 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 141 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 51 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 26 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 14 | The ultraviolet (UV) irradiation Induced Heat Hyperalgesia rat biomarker model for Pain Research | 2015 | 1 |
About Thomas Pitcher
Thomas Pitcher is a scholar working on Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Rheumatology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 661 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (9 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (2 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (2 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (2 papers), Ion Channels and Receptors (2 papers), Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (2 papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (268 citations), Rheumatology (144 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (151 citations), Sensory Systems (35 citations) and Neurology (54 citations). Thomas Pitcher has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Marzia Malcangio, João de Sousa Valente, Valentina Vacca, Raffaele Simeoli, Karli Montague-Cardoso, Hadil Alahdal, David Chambers, Hefin Jones, Liang‐Fong Wong and John Grist. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Journal of Visualized Experiments, European Journal of Pain, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and Brain Behavior and Immunity.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.