Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat

3.2k citations
88 papers · 2.2k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat

76 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 927
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 499
  • Biological Psychiatry 43
  • Neurology 143
  • Developmental Neuroscience 54
Replace Ikuko Mohri with:
Ikuko Mohri Japan
Nicole Schmitz Netherlands
Daniel Felsky Canada
Yongfeng Yang China
Toni L. Pitcher New Zealand
Elliot L. Hong United States
Kristel R. van Eijk Netherlands
Matthew Hill United Kingdom
Ornit Chiba‐Falek United States
Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat relative to Ikuko Mohri Japan Ikuko Mohri's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Ikuko Mohri · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat. The network helps show where Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 88 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011266
2 2008216
3 2012106
4 200795
5 201983
6 201075
7 201774
8 201172
9 201767
10 201464
11 201658
12 202056
13 201249
14 201145
15 201844
16 201843
17 201842
18 201642
19 201838
20 202337

About Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat

Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Genetics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 88 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (20 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (19 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (15 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (12 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (11 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (6 papers) and Congenital heart defects research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (927 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (499 citations), Biological Psychiatry (43 citations), Neurology (143 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (54 citations). Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Simon Bodo Eickhoff, Tanja Maria Michel, Frank W. Schneider, Peter T. Fox, Angela R. Laird, Ute Habel, Ted G. Abel, Anett Doerfelt, Michael Grözinger and Anja‐Katrin Bosserhoff. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Molecular Psychiatry, Brain Structure and Function, NeuroImage Clinical and Human Brain Mapping.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact