Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat

3.1k citations
78 papers · 1.9k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat

67 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 814
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 394
  • Neurology 116
  • Developmental Neuroscience 53
  • Genetics 337
Replace Ikuko Mohri with:
Ikuko Mohri Japan
Daniel Felsky Canada
Nicole Schmitz Netherlands
Kuriko Kagitani‐Shimono Japan
Valeria Latorre Italy
Matthew Hill United Kingdom
Patrice L. Whitehead United States
Christiane Cox United States
Geert Poelmans Netherlands
Shi-Yu Zhou China
Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat relative to Ikuko Mohri Japan Ikuko Mohri's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Ikuko Mohri · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat. The network helps show where Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011256
2 2008209
3 2012104
4 200793
5 201073
6 201170
7 201765
8 201763
9 201459
10 201656
11 202050
12 201248
13 201140
14 201640
15 201840
16 201839
17 201839
18 201836
19 202333
20 200731

About Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat

Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Genetics, Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 78 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (19 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (18 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (13 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (11 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), Congenital heart defects research (5 papers) and Neurological disorders and treatments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (814 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (394 citations), Neurology (116 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (53 citations) and Genetics (337 citations). Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Simon B. Eickhoff, Tanja Maria Michel, Frank Schneider, Peter T. Fox, Angela R. Laird, Ute Habel, Ted Abel, Anett Doerfelt, Anja‐Katrin Bosserhoff and Peter Hau. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Structure and Function, Biological Psychiatry, NeuroImage Clinical, Molecular Psychiatry and Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact