Thomas Neusius
Impact in
- Modeling and Simulation top 5%
- Fractional Differential Equations Solutions
-
- stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
Papers in
-
- Social and Demographic Issues in Germany 3
- Global Health Care Issues 3
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout 2
-
- Protein Structure and Dynamics 4
- Co-authors
- Jeremy C. Smith (5 shared papers)Igor M. Sokolov (3 shared papers)Xiaohu Hu (2 shared papers)Liang Hong (2 shared papers)Xiaolin Cheng (2 shared papers)Micholas Dean Smith (2 shared papers)Isabella Daidone (2 shared papers)Stefano Barco (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Nature Physics (2 papers)International Journal of Public Health (1 paper)Journal of Healthcare Leadership (1 paper)European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (1 paper)Thrombosis and Haemostasis (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Thomas Neusius
10 papers receiving 295 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Modeling and Simulation 54
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 81
- Condensed Matter Physics 33
- Mathematical Physics 25
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 79
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Neusius
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Neusius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Neusius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Neusius more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Neusius
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Neusius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Neusius. The network helps show where Thomas Neusius may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Neusius, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 127 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 72 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 0 |
About Thomas Neusius
Thomas Neusius is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Molecular Biology, Clinical Psychology, Internal Medicine and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 299 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein Structure and Dynamics (4 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (3 papers), Global Health Care Issues (3 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (2 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (54 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (81 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (33 citations), Mathematical Physics (25 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (79 citations). Thomas Neusius has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy C. Smith, Igor M. Sokolov, Xiaohu Hu, Liang Hong, Xiaolin Cheng, Micholas Dean Smith, Isabella Daidone, Stefano Barco, Christina Abele and Karsten Keller. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Physics, International Journal of Public Health, Journal of Healthcare Leadership, European Journal of Preventive Cardiology and Thrombosis and Haemostasis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.