Thomas Munck
Impact in
- History top 5%
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
- European Political History Analysis
Papers in
-
- Historical Influence and Diplomacy 5
- Historical Legal Studies and Society 3
- European and International Law Studies 2
- History 5
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 3
- Scottish History and National Identity 2
- Co-authors
- Evan Mawdsley (1 shared paper)Richard Jensen (1 shared paper)Jean‐Sébastien Tancrez (1 shared paper)Philippe Chévalier (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The English Historical Review (2 papers)European History Quarterly (1 paper)The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (1 paper)The American Historical Review (1 paper)International Journal of Production Economics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBelgium
In The Last Decade
Thomas Munck
17 papers receiving 136 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- History 43
- History and Philosophy of Science 17
- Anthropology 34
- Philosophy 29
- Museology 7
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Munck
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Munck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Munck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Munck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Munck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Munck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Munck. The network helps show where Thomas Munck may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Munck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 93 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 21 | |
| 3 | 1990 | 9 | |
| 4 | Seventeenth Century Europe: State, Conflict and the Social Order in Europe 1598-1700 | 1990 | 8 |
| 5 | Historia social de la Ilustración | 2001 | 5 |
| 6 | 1998 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2000 | 0 |
About Thomas Munck
Thomas Munck is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History, Economics and Econometrics, Automotive Engineering and Management Information Systems, having authored 20 papers that have together received 167 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Influence and Diplomacy (5 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers), Historical Legal Studies and Society (3 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers), European and International Law Studies (2 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers), Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis (1 paper) and Historical Education Studies Worldwide (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (43 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (17 citations), Anthropology (34 citations), Philosophy (29 citations) and Museology (7 citations). Thomas Munck has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Evan Mawdsley, Richard Jensen, Jean‐Sébastien Tancrez and Philippe Chévalier. Their work appears in journals such as The English Historical Review, European History Quarterly, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, The American Historical Review and International Journal of Production Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.