Thomas Munck

795 citations
25 papers · 270 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Munck

19 papers receiving 192 citations

Peers

Thomas Munck
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • History 84
  • History and Philosophy of Science 30
  • Anthropology 41
  • Philosophy 43
  • Political Science and International Relations 80
Replace David Spadafora with:
David Spadafora United States
James Grantham Turner United States
Kirstie M. McClure United States
James P. Gilroy
Timothy Hampton United States
François Moureau France
Emmet Kennedy United States
Harry C. Payne United States
John M. Headley United States
Bruce L. Kinzer Canada
Thomas Munck relative to David Spadafora United States David Spadafora's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×39×
David Spadafora · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Munck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Munck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Munck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Munck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Munck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Munck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Munck. The network helps show where Thomas Munck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Munck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Munck Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Munck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002123
2
Seventeenth Century Europe: State, Conflict and the Social Order in Europe 1598-1700
199035
3 200028
4 200525
5 199017
6 19986
7 20195
8
Historia social de la Ilustración
20015
9 20044
10 20184
11 20103
12 19963
13 20152
14 20072
15 20152
16 20232
17 20182
18 20121
19 20011
20
Forced Labour, Workhouse-Prisons And The Early Modern State: A Case Study
19970

About Thomas Munck

Thomas Munck is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, History, Automotive Engineering and Management Information Systems, having authored 25 papers that have together received 270 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Influence and Diplomacy (6 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (5 papers), Historical Legal Studies and Society (3 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers), European Political History Analysis (2 papers), European and International Law Studies (2 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers) and Historical and Literary Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (84 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (30 citations), Anthropology (41 citations), Philosophy (43 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (80 citations). Thomas Munck has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Richard Jensen, Evan Mawdsley, Philippe Chévalier and Jean‐Sébastien Tancrez. Their work appears in journals such as The English Historical Review, European History Quarterly, International Journal of Production Economics, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and The Historical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact