Thomas Meyer

99 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

Thomas Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
  • Sensory Systems 254
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 624
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 457
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 941
  • Equine 34
Replace Michael B. Smith with:
Michael B. Smith United States
Takashi Inoue Japan
Mitsuru Adachi Japan
W. Namkung South Korea
Yasuhiro Abe Japan
Péter Schmidt Germany
Shinya Suzuki Japan
Barry A. Levine United States
Róbert Wágner Germany
Atsushi Ogata Japan
Thomas Meyer relative to Michael B. Smith United States Michael B. Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Michael B. Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Meyer. The network helps show where Thomas Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Meyer Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003376
2 2009309
3 2015267
4 1965178
5 2004153
6 1972145
7 2010135
8 2004113
9
Higher lung deposition with Respimat Soft Mist inhaler than HFA-MDI in COPD patients with poor technique.
200892
10 200991
11 200077
12 200876
13 200669
14 201469
15 201968
16 201163
17 200360
18 201158
19 197952
20 201451

About Thomas Meyer

Thomas Meyer is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Physiology, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Molecular Biology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 101 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (26 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (12 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (12 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (11 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (11 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (9 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (8 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (254 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (624 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (457 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (941 citations) and Equine (34 citations). Thomas Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include B.L. Lamberts, Peter Brand, Elke Guenther, Ulrich Egert, J. Heyder, Christine L. Mummery, Knut Sommerer, Stefan Braam, W. Nisch and Frank Hofmann. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Letters B, Otology & Neurotology, Physical Review Letters, European Respiratory Journal and Experimental Lung Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact