Experimental Lung Research

2.0k papers and 37.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Experimental Lung Research in the last decades have received a total of 37.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Experimental Lung Research usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.2k papers), Molecular Biology (479 papers) and Physiology (355 papers) specifically the topics of Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (545 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (287 papers) and Asthma and respiratory diseases (234 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Experimental Lung Research are Alvin M. Malkinson, Kevin E. Driscoll, Steven L. Kunkel, Charles G. Plopper, Ank A. W. Ten Have‐Opbroek, Shri N. Giri, Ian Y. R. Adamson, D. H. Bowden, Hanspeter Witschi and Per Camner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Experimental Lung Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Experimental Lung Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Experimental Lung Research.

Countries where authors publish in Experimental Lung Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Experimental Lung Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Experimental Lung Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Experimental Lung Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025