Thomas M. Meyer

2.8k citations
56 papers · 1.3k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas M. Meyer

52 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Thomas M. Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Communication 400
  • Political Science and International Relations 1.0k
  • Strategy and Management 376
  • Public Administration 52
  • Gender Studies 120
Replace Anke Tresch with:
Anke Tresch Switzerland
Simon Otjes Netherlands
Hans‐Jörg Trenz Norway
Kenneth Janda United States
Martha Joynt Kumar United States
Joost van Spanje Netherlands
Emiliano Grossman France
Karlheinz Reif Germany
Gideon Rahat Israel
Kees Aarts Netherlands
Thomas M. Meyer relative to Anke Tresch Switzerland Anke Tresch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Anke Tresch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Meyer. The network helps show where Thomas M. Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas M. Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas M. Meyer Line = papers co-authored together Thomas M. Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014191
2
Media Democracy: How the Media Colonize Politics
2002129
3 2016108
4 201389
5 201389
6 201758
7 201748
8 201545
9 201944
10 201042
11 201541
12
The Theory of Social Democracy
200738
13 201535
14 201735
15 201731
16 201829
17 201724
18 199223
19 201522
20 202120

About Thomas M. Meyer

Thomas M. Meyer is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (33 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (24 papers), Social Media and Politics (13 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (8 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (3 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (3 papers) and Media Influence and Politics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (400 citations), Political Science and International Relations (1.0k citations), Strategy and Management (376 citations), Public Administration (52 citations) and Gender Studies (120 citations). Thomas M. Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Markus Wagner, Alejandro Ecker, Wolfgang C. Müller, Martin Haselmayer, Lewis P. Hinchman, Ralf Steinmetz, Carolina Plescia, Heiko Giebler, Laurenz Ennser‐Jedenastik and Ulrich Sieberer. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Political Science, Party Politics, West European Politics, European Journal of Political Research and Political Science Research and Methods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact