Thomas M. Meyer

2.9k citations
74 papers · 1.7k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas M. Meyer

63 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Thomas M. Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Communication 439
  • Political Science and International Relations 1.2k
  • Strategy and Management 420
  • Public Administration 67
  • Gender Studies 129
Replace Erica Edwards with:
Erica Edwards United States
Simon Otjes Netherlands
Thomas Gschwend Germany
Sean M. Theriault United States
Rüdiger Schmitt‐Beck Germany
David B. Magleby United States
Hans Noel United States
Kees Aarts Netherlands
William Cross Canada
Matt Grossmann United States
Thomas M. Meyer relative to Erica Edwards United States Erica Edwards's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.5×
Erica Edwards · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Meyer. The network helps show where Thomas M. Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas M. Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas M. Meyer Line = papers co-authored together Thomas M. Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014213
2
Media Democracy: How the Media Colonize Politics
2002149
3 2016121
4 2013104
5 201395
6 201765
7
The Theory of Social Democracy
200759
8 201756
9 201053
10 201951
11 201550
12 201546
13 201740
14 201539
15 201837
16 201736
17 200032
18 199228
19 201527
20 201726

About Thomas M. Meyer

Thomas M. Meyer is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Public Administration, having authored 74 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (34 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (25 papers), Social Media and Politics (13 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (7 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (3 papers), Economic and Social Issues (3 papers) and Media Influence and Politics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (439 citations), Political Science and International Relations (1.2k citations), Strategy and Management (420 citations), Public Administration (67 citations) and Gender Studies (129 citations). Thomas M. Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Markus Wagner, Alejandro Ecker, Wolfgang C. Müller, Martin Haselmayer, Lewis P. Hinchman, Ralf Steinmetz, Carolina Plescia, Heiko Giebler, Ulrich Sieberer and Laurenz Ennser‐Jedenastik. Their work appears in journals such as Party Politics, British Journal of Political Science, West European Politics, European Journal of Political Research and Electoral Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact