Party Politics

1.6k papers and 36.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Party Politics in the last decades have received a total of 36.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Party Politics usually cover Political Science and International Relations (1.4k papers), Sociology and Political Science (491 papers) and Strategy and Management (450 papers) specifically the topics of Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1.2k papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (448 papers) and Populism, Right-Wing Movements (386 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Party Politics are Richard S. Katz, Peter Mair, Ingrid van Biezen, Pippa Norris, Herbert Kitschelt, Robert R. Barr, Joost van Spanje, Ronald Inglehart, John D. Huber and Gideon Rahat.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Party Politics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Party Politics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Party Politics.

Countries where authors publish in Party Politics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Party Politics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Party Politics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Party Politics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025