Matt Grossmann

1.7k citations
40 papers · 741 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Matt Grossmann

37 papers receiving 682 citations

Peers

Matt Grossmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Communication 175
  • Political Science and International Relations 486
  • Public Administration 61
  • Strategy and Management 246
  • Gender Studies 97
Replace Shaun Bevan with:
Shaun Bevan United Kingdom
Rudy B. Andeweg Netherlands
Robert Harmel United States
Daniele Caramani Switzerland
Ludger Helms Austria
Robert G. Boatright United States
Martha Joynt Kumar United States
Kees Aarts Netherlands
Hans‐Jörg Trenz Norway
Paul Webb United Kingdom
Matt Grossmann relative to Shaun Bevan United Kingdom Shaun Bevan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Shaun Bevan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matt Grossmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matt Grossmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matt Grossmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matt Grossmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matt Grossmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matt Grossmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matt Grossmann. The network helps show where Matt Grossmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Matt Grossmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matt Grossmann Line = papers co-authored together Matt Grossmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats
2016117
2 2015113
3 200988
4 201975
5 201260
6 202134
7 201229
8 201222
9 201821
10 201420
11 202116
12 202415
13 202015
14 201315
15 201212
16 201912
17 200912
18 20189
19 20098
20 20157

About Matt Grossmann

Matt Grossmann is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Public Administration, having authored 40 papers that have together received 741 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (21 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (19 papers), Policy Transfer and Learning (7 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers), Social Media and Politics (5 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (4 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 papers) and Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (175 citations), Political Science and International Relations (486 citations), Public Administration (61 citations), Strategy and Management (246 citations) and Gender Studies (97 citations). Matt Grossmann has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David A. Hopkins, Joshua McCrain, Sarah Reckhow, William Isaac, Brendon Swedlow, Christopher Wlezien, Katharine O. Strunk, Brendan Nyhan and Jennifer Lee. Their work appears in journals such as The Forum, Interest Groups & Advocacy, American Politics Research, PS Political Science & Politics and The Journal of Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact