William Cross

2.7k citations
98 papers · 1.6k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

William Cross

90 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

William Cross
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Political Science and International Relations 1.3k
  • Gender Studies 493
  • Communication 329
  • Public Administration 107
  • Strategy and Management 452
Replace Kris Deschouwer with:
Kris Deschouwer Belgium
Paul Webb United Kingdom
Michael H. Crespin United States
Eric Lawrence United States
David Arter United Kingdom
Emiliano Grossman France
Seth E. Masket United States
Norbert Kersting Germany
Shane Martin United Kingdom
Sven‐Oliver Proksch Germany
William Cross relative to Kris Deschouwer Belgium Kris Deschouwer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Kris Deschouwer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Cross

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Cross's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Cross with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Cross more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Cross

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Cross. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Cross. The network helps show where William Cross may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Cross, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Cross Line = papers co-authored together William Cross links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 98 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016153
2 2011136
3 201397
4 201281
5 200766
6 200854
7 200451
8 201651
9 200842
10
Politics at the Centre: The Selection and Removal of Party Leaders in the Anglo Parliamentary Democracies
201241
11 200238
12 201638
13 200237
14 200237
15 200634
16 201532
17 201531
18 201630
19 201430
20 199628

About William Cross

William Cross is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Computer Science Applications, Gender Studies, Communication and Public Administration, having authored 98 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (33 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (17 papers), Open Education and E-Learning (15 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (14 papers), Political Systems and Governance (14 papers), Social Media and Politics (11 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (10 papers) and Canadian Identity and History (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (1.3k citations), Gender Studies (493 citations), Communication (329 citations), Public Administration (107 citations) and Strategy and Management (452 citations). William Cross has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Lisa J. Young, André Blais, Scott Pruysers, Richard S. Katz, Anika Gauja, R. Kenneth Carty, Jean‐Benoît Pilet, Gideon Rahat, Ofer Kenig and Laura Beth Stephenson. Their work appears in journals such as Party Politics, Canadian Journal of Political Science, Representation, Political Research Quarterly and Electoral Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact