Thomas Lutz
Impact in
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Papers in
-
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 3
- Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques 2
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 2
- DNA Repair Mechanisms 1
-
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances 1
- Co-authors
- O. Gratzl (3 shared papers)Hans‐Peter Landolt (3 shared papers)L. Hösli (1 shared paper)Rainer Lehmann (1 shared paper)Elisabeth Hösli (1 shared paper)Aminadav Mendelowitsch (1 shared paper)C.G. Honegger (1 shared paper)H. Langemann (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Frontiers in Microbiology (2 papers)Nucleic Acids Research (2 papers)Bioconjugate Chemistry (1 paper)Neuroscience (1 paper)Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandUnited StatesPoland
In The Last Decade
Thomas Lutz
12 papers receiving 335 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Developmental Neuroscience 21
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 98
- Neurology 26
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 51
- Nephrology 18
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Lutz
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Lutz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Lutz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Lutz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Lutz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Lutz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Lutz. The network helps show where Thomas Lutz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Lutz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1992 | 81 | |
| 2 | 1982 | 77 | |
| 3 | Clinical assessment of a novel antiadhesion barrier gel: prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial of ADCON-L to inhibit postoperative peridural fibrosis and related symptoms after lumbar discectomy. | 1998 | 70 |
| 4 | 2004 | 29 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 7 | 1994 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 2 |
About Thomas Lutz
Thomas Lutz is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Neurology, Surgery, Nephrology and Pharmacology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 349 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (3 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (2 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (1 paper), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (1 paper), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1 paper) and Conducting polymers and applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (21 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (98 citations), Neurology (26 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (51 citations) and Nephrology (18 citations). Thomas Lutz has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include O. Gratzl, Hans‐Peter Landolt, L. Hösli, Rainer Lehmann, Elisabeth Hösli, Aminadav Mendelowitsch, C.G. Honegger, H. Langemann, Reto Krapf and Henry N. Hulter. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Microbiology, Nucleic Acids Research, Bioconjugate Chemistry, Neuroscience and Journal of the American Society of Nephrology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.