Thomas Leitch

757 citations
27 papers · 172 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Leitch

17 papers receiving 124 citations

Peers

Thomas Leitch
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Literature and Literary Theory 93
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 18
  • Music 10
  • Communication 20
  • Economics and Econometrics 53
Replace John A. Dussinger with:
John A. Dussinger United States
Michael Neill New Zealand
Barry Keith Grant Canada
David Scott Kastan United Kingdom
Jeremy G. Butler United States
Irina O. Rajewsky Germany
John Caughie United Kingdom
Leah S. Marcus United States
Robert Burgoyne United States
Timothy Corrigan United States
Thomas Leitch relative to John A. Dussinger United States John A. Dussinger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
John A. Dussinger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Leitch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Leitch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Leitch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Leitch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Leitch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Leitch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Leitch. The network helps show where Thomas Leitch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Leitch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Leitch Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Leitch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200954
2 199240
3 200217
4 201415
5
Find the director and other Hitchcock games
19916
6
Wikipedia U: Knowledge, Authority, and Liberal Education in the Digital Age
20146
7 19876
8 20115
9 20174
10 19924
11 20083
12 20182
13 20202
14 20192
15 20072
16 20192
17 19851
18 20211
19 20160
20
Reading like adults, performing like children: Two ways of experiencing adaptations
20120

About Thomas Leitch

Thomas Leitch is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Economics and Econometrics, Law, Communication and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 172 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (10 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (10 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (3 papers), Law in Society and Culture (3 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (2 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (2 papers), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (2 papers) and Wikis in Education and Collaboration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (93 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (18 citations), Music (10 citations), Communication (20 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (53 citations). Thomas Leitch has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jo Labanyi, Alexander Welsh, Alistair M. Duckworth, Christopher P. Ames, Robert Stam, Matt A. Bernstein, Allen Woll, Robert Sklar, John Kucich and Robert P. Kolker. Their work appears in journals such as Adaptation, The Modern Language Review, Literature film quarterly, Journal of Screenwriting and ˜The œHenry James review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact