Thomas Hood

945 citations
34 papers · 641 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Hood

27 papers receiving 513 citations

Peers

Thomas Hood
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Public Administration 27
  • Sociology and Political Science 310
  • Communication 46
  • Applied Psychology 30
  • General Decision Sciences 10
Replace Bruce P. Frohnen with:
Bruce P. Frohnen United States
Lloyd S. Etheredge United States
Paul Wehr United States
G. Duncan Mitchell
Clara Sabbagh Israel
Peter G. Stillman United States
John Pennington United States
John L. Thomas United States
John H. Schaar United States
Richard A. Couto United States
Thomas Hood relative to Bruce P. Frohnen United States Bruce P. Frohnen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Bruce P. Frohnen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Hood

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Hood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Hood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Hood more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Hood

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Hood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Hood. The network helps show where Thomas Hood may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Hood, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Hood Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Hood links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974193
2 1984112
3 198488
4 197141
5 198830
6 198030
7 198325
8 197524
9 196515
10 196512
11 197410
12 196410
13 197310
14
CAR-POOLING PROGRAMS: SOLUTION TO A PROBLEM?
19778
15
Prose and Verse
20055
16 19764
17 20243
18 19923
19 19663
20 19813

About Thomas Hood

Thomas Hood is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Health, Molecular Biology, Political Science and International Relations and Automotive Engineering, having authored 34 papers that have together received 641 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (1 paper), Transportation and Mobility Innovations (1 paper) and Media, Gender, and Advertising (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (27 citations), Sociology and Political Science (310 citations), Communication (46 citations), Applied Psychology (30 citations) and General Decision Sciences (10 citations). Thomas Hood has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Peter Adler, Carl M. Hand, Jo Freeman, Kurt W. Back, M. D. Pugh, Joseph B. Perry, J. C. Whitehouse, Serge Moscovici, Kent D. Van Liere and Anthony E. Ladd. Their work appears in journals such as Social Forces, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Sociological Inquiry, Huntington Library Quarterly and Metabolism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact