Thomas Hackl

71 papers receiving 708 citations

Peers

Thomas Hackl
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 154
  • Analytical Chemistry 111
  • Biotechnology 53
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 17
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 82
Replace John Delaney with:
John Delaney United Kingdom
Peter Fleischmann Germany
Stefan Verhoeven Netherlands
V. Bokka United States
Fabien Jourdan France
Clemens Gröpl Germany
Shaoyong Zhang China
Liu Shao United States
Bowen Tang China
Linli Wang China
Thomas Hackl relative to John Delaney United Kingdom John Delaney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
John Delaney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Hackl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Hackl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Hackl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Hackl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Hackl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Hackl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Hackl. The network helps show where Thomas Hackl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Hackl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Hackl Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Hackl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201669
2 201847
3 202140
4 202138
5 201536
6 201130
7 200529
8 200428
9 200726
10 201125
11 202023
12 201021
13 201719
14 202019
15 201718
16 200016
17 200916
18 202016
19 202013
20 202113

About Thomas Hackl

Thomas Hackl is a scholar working on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 77 papers that have together received 735 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (42 papers), Advanced Graph Theory Research (25 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (12 papers), Digital Image Processing Techniques (9 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (6 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (6 papers), Nuts composition and effects (6 papers) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (154 citations), Analytical Chemistry (111 citations), Biotechnology (53 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (17 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (82 citations). Thomas Hackl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Markus Fischer, Oswin Aichholzer, Birgit Vogtenhuber, Clemens Huemer, Bernd Meyer, Wilfried Α. König, Caroline Schmitt, Ferrán Hurtado, Stephan Seifert and Jorge Urrutia. Their work appears in journals such as Computational Geometry, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Graphs and Combinatorics, Scientific Reports and Discrete & Computational Geometry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact