Thomas Gärtner

673 citations
16 papers · 485 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Gärtner

16 papers receiving 468 citations

Peers

Thomas Gärtner
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 148
  • Applied Psychology 51
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 32
  • Clinical Psychology 120
  • Biological Psychiatry 14
Replace Itzhak Ben-Zion with:
Itzhak Ben-Zion Israel
A. Craig United States
Παναγιώτα Κορκολιάκου Greece
Mark J. Scharf United States
Christopher MA Frampton New Zealand
Noreen Caswell United Kingdom
Rani Gera India
Lauren A. Hudak United States
Lawrence S. Gaines United States
Dominic Stringer United Kingdom
Thomas Gärtner relative to Itzhak Ben-Zion Israel Itzhak Ben-Zion's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Itzhak Ben-Zion · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Gärtner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Gärtner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Gärtner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Gärtner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Gärtner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Gärtner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Gärtner. The network helps show where Thomas Gärtner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Gärtner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Gärtner Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Gärtner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2003205
2 201877
3 201952
4 202135
5 201932
6 202119
7 202017
8 202016
9 20219
10 19986
11 20226
12 20195
13 20242
14 20022
15 20021
16 20161

About Thomas Gärtner

Thomas Gärtner is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 16 papers that have together received 485 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (7 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (4 papers), Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (3 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers) and Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (148 citations), Applied Psychology (51 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (32 citations), Clinical Psychology (120 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (14 citations). Thomas Gärtner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Tobias Κube, Winfried Rief, Julia Anna Glombiewski, Norbert Lange, Bjørn Brennhovd, Louis Guillou, Steinar Karlsen, D. Jocham, Patrice Jichlinski and Per‐Uno Malmström. Their work appears in journals such as Behaviour Research and Therapy, Journal of Affective Disorders, Psychological Medicine, Frontiers in Psychiatry and The Journal of Urology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact