Rani Gera

32 papers receiving 283 citations

Peers

Rani Gera
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Applied Psychology 41
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 41
  • General Decision Sciences 11
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 42
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 55
Replace Mylène Bolmont with:
Mylène Bolmont Switzerland
Raoul Scherwitzl Sweden
Elina Berglund Scherwitzl Sweden
Umar Muhammad Bello Hong Kong
Dominika Wilczyńska Poland
Laura Michelacci Italy
Hants Williams United States
Israel Krieger Israel
Alison Griffin Australia
Juan Carlos Sánchez-García Spain
Rani Gera relative to Mylène Bolmont Switzerland Mylène Bolmont's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Mylène Bolmont · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rani Gera

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rani Gera's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rani Gera with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rani Gera more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rani Gera

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rani Gera. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rani Gera. The network helps show where Rani Gera may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rani Gera, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rani Gera Line = papers co-authored together Rani Gera links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Consensus guidelines on pediatric acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease.
200846
2 202143
3 202043
4 202134
5 201628
6 201822
7 202021
8 202311
9 20197
10 20125
11 20234
12 20224
13 20224
14 20233
15 20163
16 20233
17 20043
18 20222
19 20232
20 20182

About Rani Gera

Rani Gera is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Oncology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 41 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction (4 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (4 papers), Neutropenia and Cancer Infections (4 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (3 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (3 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers) and Child Nutrition and Water Access (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (41 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (41 citations), General Decision Sciences (11 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (42 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (55 citations). Rani Gera has collaborated with scholars based in India, Israel and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tom Schönberg, Anitá Saxena, Smita Mishra, S. Radhakrishnan, Raman Kumar, Pradeep Debata, Nitesh Gupta, Archana Aggarwal, Segev Barak and Amitabh Singh. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, Scientific Reports, Behavior Research Methods, Blood Cells Molecules and Diseases and European Journal of Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact