Thomas Gais

12 papers receiving 203 citations

Peers

Thomas Gais
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Public Administration 53
  • Strategy and Management 101
  • Political Science and International Relations 149
  • Gender Studies 28
  • Communication 15
Replace Ronald J. Hrebenar with:
Ronald J. Hrebenar United States
Lawrence D. Longley United States
Ballard C. Campbell Mexico
Christopher J. Deering United States
Dimitris Tsarouhas Türkiye
Burdett A. Loomis United States
Andreas Broscheid United States
David C. Kozak United States
J. Timo Weishaupt Germany
Maria Spirova Netherlands
Thomas Gais relative to Ronald J. Hrebenar United States Ronald J. Hrebenar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ronald J. Hrebenar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Gais

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Gais's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Gais with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Gais more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Gais

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Gais. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Gais. The network helps show where Thomas Gais may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Gais, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Gais Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Gais links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 198496
2
The Day After Reform: Sobering Campaign Finance Lessons from the American States
199756
3 199621
4 200318
5 199812
6 200112
7 200911
8 199710
9 20006
10 19986
11 20202
12 20001
13
The State of the New York Teacher Workforce.
20181
14
The Relationship of the Decline in Welfare Cases to the New Welfare Law. How Will We Know If It Is Working? Rockefeller Reports.
19971
15
A Background on Potential Teacher Shortages in the United States.
20170

About Thomas Gais

Thomas Gais is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions, Gender Studies and Strategy and Management, having authored 15 papers that have together received 253 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (1 paper), Global Health Care Issues (1 paper), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper), School Choice and Performance (1 paper) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (53 citations), Strategy and Management (101 citations), Political Science and International Relations (149 citations), Gender Studies (28 citations) and Communication (15 citations). Thomas Gais has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Malbin, Jack L. Walker, Mark Allen Peterson, Richard P. Nathan, Faye J. Thompson, Michael K. Gusmano, Catherine Lawrence, Elizabeth L. Davis and Donald Boyd. Their work appears in journals such as Publius The Journal of Federalism, Society, Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, Political Science Quarterly and British Journal of Political Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact