Thomas G. Poder

2.4k citations
154 papers · 1.7k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas G. Poder

139 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Thomas G. Poder
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Economics and Econometrics 572
  • Immunology and Allergy 54
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 8
  • Health Informatics 20
  • General Health Professions 156
Replace Weibing Wang with:
Weibing Wang China
Richard J Fordham United Kingdom
Jun Yup Kim South Korea
Jennifer D. Parker United States
Evridiki Patelarou Greece
Ulf Persson Sweden
Tomoaki Imamura Japan
Amin Adibi Canada
Maria C. Mirabelli United States
Chris Cooper United Kingdom
Thomas G. Poder relative to Weibing Wang China Weibing Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.5×
Weibing Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas G. Poder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas G. Poder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas G. Poder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas G. Poder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas G. Poder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas G. Poder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas G. Poder. The network helps show where Thomas G. Poder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas G. Poder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas G. Poder Line = papers co-authored together Thomas G. Poder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 154 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201968
2 201961
3 201258
4 201156
5 201449
6 201644
7 202244
8 201837
9 201936
10 202036
11 202136
12 202034
13 201533
14 202132
15 201527
16 201526
17 201724
18 202124
19 201820
20 201319

About Thomas G. Poder

Thomas G. Poder is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Health Information Management, Biochemistry and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 154 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (50 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (17 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (8 papers), Blood transfusion and management (7 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (6 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers) and Electronic Health Records Systems (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (572 citations), Immunology and Allergy (54 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (8 citations), Health Informatics (20 citations) and General Health Professions (156 citations). Thomas G. Poder has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, France and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Jie He Ψ, Nathalie Carrier, Christian A. Bellemare, Pierre‐Hugues Fortier, Jérôme Dupras, Marie‐Pierre Gagnon, Jean‐François Fisette, Hosein Ameri, Marie Desmartis and William Witteman. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, PLoS ONE, BMJ Open, Value in Health and Allergy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact