Thomas G. Poder

2.2k citations
146 papers · 1.5k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas G. Poder

130 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Thomas G. Poder
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
  • Economics and Econometrics 425
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 21
  • Health Informatics 15
  • Immunology and Allergy 52
  • General Health Professions 158
Replace Tomoaki Imamura with:
Tomoaki Imamura Japan
George L. Delclos United States
Núria Aragonés Spain
Rupendra Shrestha Australia
erik svendsen United States
Simon Briscoe United Kingdom
Anna García‐Altés Spain
Madelon Lubin Finkel United States
Rajesh Vedanthan United States
Xia Wan China
Thomas G. Poder relative to Tomoaki Imamura Japan Tomoaki Imamura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Tomoaki Imamura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas G. Poder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas G. Poder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas G. Poder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas G. Poder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas G. Poder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas G. Poder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas G. Poder. The network helps show where Thomas G. Poder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas G. Poder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas G. Poder Line = papers co-authored together Thomas G. Poder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 146 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201965
2 201957
3 201157
4 201447
5 201644
6 202239
7 201936
8 201835
9 201533
10 202033
11 202132
12 202031
13 202129
14 201525
15 201525
16 201722
17 202122
18 201819
19 201918
20 201818

About Thomas G. Poder

Thomas G. Poder is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 146 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (45 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (15 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (5 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (5 papers), Healthcare Systems and Practices (4 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (4 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (4 papers) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (425 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (21 citations), Health Informatics (15 citations), Immunology and Allergy (52 citations) and General Health Professions (158 citations). Thomas G. Poder has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Nathalie Carrier, Jie He, Christian Bellemare, Jérôme Dupras, Jie He, Marie‐Pierre Gagnon, Jean‐François Fisette, Hosein Ameri, Marie Desmartis and William Witteman. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, PLoS ONE, Value in Health, BMJ Open and International Journal of Health Policy and Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact