Thomas Friedel

39 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Thomas Friedel
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Insect Science 355
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 432
  • Biotechnology 163
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 303
  • Genetics 426
Replace S. R. Dutky with:
S. R. Dutky United States
Stephan H. von Reuß Germany
Jean‐Claude Pernollet France
Rebecca A. Butcher United States
Qiang Fu China
W. M. Blaney United Kingdom
Walter Soares Leal Japan
Paul R. Ebert Australia
I.R. Duce United Kingdom
Elke Clynen Belgium
Thomas Friedel relative to S. R. Dutky United States S. R. Dutky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
S. R. Dutky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Friedel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Friedel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Friedel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Friedel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Friedel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Friedel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Friedel. The network helps show where Thomas Friedel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Friedel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Friedel Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Friedel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977126
2 198083
3 198168
4 200364
5 199861
6 197659
7 197658
8 199958
9 202157
10 200157
11 198051
12 197443
13 198942
14 200142
15 200232
16 201932
17 198531
18 200430
19 198829
20 197627

About Thomas Friedel

Thomas Friedel is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics, Insect Science, Molecular Biology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (18 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (15 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (9 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (6 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (5 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (4 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (4 papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (355 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (432 citations), Biotechnology (163 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (303 citations) and Genetics (426 citations). Thomas Friedel has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Cedric Gillott, Ernest Lacey, Robert J. Capon, Jennifer H. Gill, Stephen S. Tobe, Colin E. Skene, Kirstin Heiland, René Feyereisen, Eric C. Mundall and Franz Engelmann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Insect Physiology, Journal of Natural Products, Journal of Comparative Physiology A, General and Comparative Endocrinology and Journal of Economic Entomology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact