Thomas Friedel

41 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Thomas Friedel
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Insect Science 390
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 489
  • Biotechnology 183
  • Genetics 474
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 345
Replace S. R. Dutky with:
S. R. Dutky United States
Jean‐Claude Pernollet France
Jan Koolman Germany
Margarethe Spindler‐Barth Germany
Rebecca A. Butcher United States
W. E. Robbins United States
Sergey A. Kozlov Russia
Elisabeth F. Schwartz Brazil
Lindy Holden‐Dye United Kingdom
Elke Clynen Belgium
Thomas Friedel relative to S. R. Dutky United States S. R. Dutky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
S. R. Dutky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Friedel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Friedel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Friedel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Friedel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Friedel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Friedel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Friedel. The network helps show where Thomas Friedel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Friedel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Friedel Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Friedel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977138
2 198099
3 198172
4 200371
5 199868
6 197664
7 197664
8 199963
9 202161
10 198060
11 200159
12 197452
13 200148
14 198944
15 200238
16 201933
17 200432
18 198531
19 197631
20 199731

About Thomas Friedel

Thomas Friedel is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics, Insect Science, Molecular Biology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (18 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (15 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (9 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (6 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (5 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (4 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (3 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (390 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (489 citations), Biotechnology (183 citations), Genetics (474 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (345 citations). Thomas Friedel has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Cedric Gillott, Ernest Lacey, Robert J. Capon, Stephen S. Tobe, Jennifer H. Gill, Colin E. Skene, Kirstin Heiland, Eric C. Mundall, René Feyereisen and Franz Engelmann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Insect Physiology, Journal of Natural Products, Journal of Comparative Physiology A, The Journal of Organic Chemistry and General and Comparative Endocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact